Everything Totally Explained


Ask & we'll explain, totally!
Solar updraft tower
Totally Explained


  NEW! All the latest news in the worlds of computer gaming, entertainment, the environment,  
finance, health, politics, science, stocks & shares, technology and much, much, more.  


View this entry using RSS

Everything about Solar Updraft Tower totally explained

:This article is about a type of power plant. For other uses of the term "Solar Tower", see solar tower (disambiguation). For the use of solar energy for ventilation, see Solar chimney. The solar updraft tower is a proposed type of renewable-energy power plant. Air is heated in a very large circular greenhouse-like structure, and the resulting convection causes the air to rise and escape through a tall tower. The moving air drives turbines, which produce electricity. A research prototype operated in Spain in the 1980s.

Description

The generating ability of a solar updraft power plant depends primarily on two factors: the size of the collector area and chimney height. With a larger collector area, more volume of air is warmed up to flow up the chimney; collector areas as large as 7 km in diameter have been considered. With a larger chimney height, the pressure difference increases the stack effect; chimneys as tall as 1000 m have been considered. Further, a combined increase of the collector area and the chimney height leads to massively larger productivity of the power plant.
   Heat can be stored inside the collector area greenhouse, to be used to warm the air later on. Water, with its relatively high specific heat capacity, can be filled in tubes placed under the collector increasing the energy storage as needed. Turbines can be installed in a ring around the base of the tower, with a horizontal axis, as planned for the Australian project and seen in the diagram above; or—as in the prototype in Spain—a single vertical axis turbine can be installed inside the chimney.
   Solar towers don't produce carbon dioxide emissions during their operation, but are associated with the manufacture of its construction materials, particularly cement. Net energy payback is estimated to be 2-3 years. The relatively low-tech approach could allow local resources and labour to be used for its construction and maintenance.

History

In 1903, Spanish Colonel Isidoro Cabanyes first proposed a solar chimney power plant in the magazine "La energía eléctrica". One of the earliest descriptions of a solar chimney power plant was written in 1931 by a German author, Hanns Günther. Beginning in 1975, Robert E. Lucier applied for patents on a solar chimney electric power generator; between 1978 and 1981 these patents, since expired, were granted in Australia, Canada, Israel, and the USA.

Prototype in Spain

In 1982, a small-scale experimental model of a solar chimney power plant was built under the direction of German engineer Jörg Schlaich in Manzanares, Ciudad Real, 150 km south of Madrid, Spain; the project was funded by the German government.
   The chimney had a height of 195 metres and a diameter of 10 metres, with a collection area (greenhouse) of 46,000 m² (about 11 acres, or 244 m diameter) obtaining a maximum power output of about 50 kW. However, this was an experimental setup that wasn't intended for power generation. Instead, different materials were used for testing, such as single or double glazing or plastic (which turned out not to be durable enough) and one section was used as an actual greenhouse, growing plants under the glass. During operation, optimisation data was collected on a second-by-second basis with 180 sensors measuring inside and outside temperature, humidity and wind speed.
   In the choice of materials, it was taken into consideration that such an inefficient but cheap plant would be ideal for third world countries with lots of space - the method is inefficient in land use, but very efficient economically because of the low operating cost. So cheap materials were used on purpose, to see how they'd perform, such as a chimney built with iron plating only 1.25 mm thin and held up with guy ropes. For a commercial plant, a reinforced concrete tower would be a better choice.
   This pilot power plant operated for approximately eight years, but the chimney guy rods were not protected against corrosion and not expected to last longer than the intended test period of three years. So, not surprisingly, after eight years they'd rusted through and broke in a storm, causing the tower to fall over and the plant was decommissioned in 1989.
   Based on the test results, it was estimated that a 100 MW plant would require a 1000 m tower and a greenhouse of 20 km2. Because the costs lie mainly in construction and not in operation (free 'fuel', little maintenance and only 7 personnel), the cost per energy is largely determined by interest rates and years of operation, varying from 5 eurocent per kWh for 4% and 20 years to 15 eurocent per kWh for 12% and 40 years.

Ciudad Real Torre Solar

There is a proposal to construct a solar updraft tower in Ciudad Real, Spain entitled Ciudad Real Torre Solar. If built, it would be the first of its kind in the European Union and would stand 750 metres tall – nearly twice as tall as the current tallest structure in the EU, the Belmont TV Mast – covering an area of 350 hectares. It is expected to output 40 MW of electricity.

Australian proposal

EnviroMission has since 2001 proposed to build a solar updraft tower power generating station known as Solar Tower Buronga at a location near Buronga, New South Wales. Technical details of the project are difficult to obtain and the present status of the project is uncertain.
   On 18 March 2007, the company board announced a merger with the US-based SolarMission Technologies, Inc. SolarMission is now the official Solar Tower developer.
   November 1, 2007- Mutual termination of the merger between EnviroMission and SolarMission. They will evaluate the possibility of future alliances when they serve the interests of both parties.

Conversion rate of solar energy to electrical energy

The solar updraft tower doesn't convert all the incoming solar energy into electrical energy. Many designs in the (high temperature) solar thermal group of collectors have higher conversion rates. The low conversion rate of the Solar Tower is balanced to some extent by the low investment cost per square metre of solar collection.
   According to model calculations, a simple updraft power plant with an output of 200 MW would need a collector 7 kilometres in diameter (total area of about 38 km²) and a 1000-metre-high chimney.
   The performance of an updraft tower may be degraded by factors such as atmospheric winds, by drag induced by bracings used for supporting the chimney, and by reflection off the top of the greenhouse canopy.
   Location is also a factor. A Solar updraft power plant located at high latitudes such as in Canada, only if sloped towards the south, would produce up to 85 per cent of the output of a similar plant located closer to the equator.

Related and adapted ideas

  • The Vortex engine proposal replaces the physical chimney by a vortex of twisting air.
  • Floating Solar Chimney Technology proposes to keep a lightweight chimney aloft using rings of lifting balloons filled with a lighter-than-air gas.
  • The chimney could be constructed up a mountainside, using the terrain for support.
  • The inverse of the solar updraft tower is the downdraft-driven energy tower. Evaporation of sprayed water at the top of the tower would cause a downdraft by cooling the air and driving wind turbines at the bottom of the tower.
  • The SCAF, Solar City Air Filtre, proposes to use the same principle but on a smaller scale with the addition of filters to help clean the air of a city.
  • It has been proposed to use the greenhouse for food production (except near the tower where the winds would be too strong).

Financial feasibility

This section discusses only the classical design of a Solar updraft tower: more exotic variations are not considered.
   A solar updraft power station would require a very large initial capital outlay, which may be offset by relatively low operating cost. and maintenance.
   There is still a great amount of uncertainty and debate on what the cost of production for electricity would be for a solar updraft tower and whether a tower (large or small) can be made profitable. Schlaich et al. Compare this to LECs of approximately 5 US cents per KWh for a 100 MW plant, wind or natural gas. No reliable electricity cost figures will exist until such time as actual data are available on a utility scale power plant, since cost predictions for a time scale of 25 years or more are unreliable.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Solar Updraft Tower'.


External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

    <a href="http://solar_updraft_tower.totallyexplained.com">Solar updraft tower Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
   As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.



Copyright © 2007-8 totallyexplained.com | Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Site Map
This article contains text from the Wikipedia article Solar updraft tower (History) and is released under the GFDL | RSS Version